They have us coming and going
The companies selling us filters to remove "forever chemicals" from our drinking water are the ones who put them there.
We recently installed an under sink reverse osmosis system1, mostly to improve the taste of our drinking water and to limit scaling in tea kettles and coffee machines.
Our water comes from a community well. The water has tested below State detection limits for PFAS (per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances, commonly known as “Forever Chemicals”), and is chlorinated and treated for arsenic, iron, and manganese. It remains hard water that scales tea kettles, smells of chlorine, and still contains a little arsenic. Other organic compounds tested, such as volatile organic compounds, synthetic organic compounds such as pesticides and herbicides, and disinfection byproducts, are low, but more could be present that are not tested. We decided to put in a filter that would take care of all of these contaminants as well as improving the taste. The six-stage filter system we chose is designed to do just that. Installation was straightforward and we’re happy with the results. No more descaling the espresso machine!
Many people whose water tests positive for PFAS install these filter systems to remove it. The PFAS compounds most commonly found at hazardous levels in drinking water were manufactured primarily by 3M and Dupont. The health effects of PFAS2 are well documented. Books3 have been written, movies4 made, and lawsuits5 filed about these companies’ disregard for the suffering caused by these materials. Most of Dupont was acquired by Dow Chemical, although the PFAS business was spun off into a separate company. Dow Chemical also manufactures some of the other hazardous synthetic organic compounds found in drinking water.
While many companies assemble and sell reverse osmosis (RO) systems, only a handful manufacture the active filter elements that do most of the work of removing PFAS and other significant contaminants. On unboxing our RO system, I was shocked, but not surprised, to find that the granulated active carbon filter in the second stage is manufactured by 3M, and that the reverse osmosis membrane in the fifth stage is manufactured by the Filmtec subsidiary of Dow Chemical, formerly a subsidiary of Dupont.
I’ve visited communities whose water is so contaminated with PFAS that they can’t even shower in it.
PFAS has figured large in my life recently. I’m working with a grant from Washington State Department of Ecology for public outreach on contamination of groundwater with PFAS. I’ve visited communities6 whose water is so contaminated with PFAS that they can’t even shower in it. They’re drinking bottled water and taking showers at the YMCA.
Homeowners in these communities have been promised whole-house filtration systems so that they can not only drink the water, but bathe, cook, water their vegetable gardens, and do all the other things with water that the rest of us take for granted.
Whole-house RO systems are expensive to install and to maintain, as the filters must be replaced periodically. Affected communities struggle to find funding for testing and treatment. Well-meaning federal, state, and local agencies struggle to help, stuck within a framework of laws like CERCLA7, the Superfund law, that are designed for individual sites and instant train wrecks, rather than the dispersed slow-motion train wreck that is PFAS.
The odds are high that those systems will contain components made by the companies that made the poisons they’re removing.
In March 2023, EPA announced proposed maximum contaminant levels8 for several PFAS compounds. They are expected to become law in 2024 and to take full effect in 2026. Based on test results to date, around five percent of ground water drinking water systems nationwide will exceed these new limits. Although not subject to mandatory testing, private wells serving homeowners can be expected to have exceedances in similar percentages. Others will have significant detections of other PFAS compounds that don’t yet have limits.
Many will choose filtration or reverse osmosis as the solution. The odds are high that the filters they install will contain components made by the very companies that made the poisons they’re removing. The initial installations and periodic filter replacements will represent a windfall for them.
They have us coming and going.
This was a super interesting and informative piece, John.
It’s quite distressing that the same companies that pollute the water make some of the products to clean the water - that is an unnerving little system they’ve got going on.
Thanks for keeping us informed.