Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jaci Mach's avatar

The grey tsunami, yes! Our commissioners are 83ish, days away from 75yo, and mid 60's. When asked, younger residents say "it's not my job!" If we don't find younger replacements, our answer is to sell out to Northwest Natural Water Services which is not acceptable.

Expand full comment
Kirie Pedersen's avatar

I look forward to hearing more, John, about "issues with water rights and land use that are complex enough to earn a dedicated post at some point." I've been reflecting about how so much of Puget Sound and Salish Sea shorelines are occupied by mega-mansions (or tiny cabins for that matter) the owners might visit once or twice a year, importing groceries not locally purchased and friends and family who have no awareness of the local communities. As we've discussed, each residence has its own well and septic and driveways. I've made an appointment with a local non-profit habitat preservation group I've worked with for many years to place my own shoreline-adjacent acreage including shoreline to the low tide level as a wildlife habitat in perpetuity. My idea is to leave the house and property to house environmental activists like me who had to earn a living elsewhere. The group has acquired and protected many local shoreline and adjacent heritage forests in perpetuity, and I'd like to see more, and serve as a role model, in my dreams perhaps, to others to "donate" their shoreline properties.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts